This Month
December 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Powered by BlogHarbor
Powered by BlogHarbor
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
Powered by BlogHarbor
Powered by BlogHarbor
Search
RSS Newsfeeds
The Subway Canaries Main RSS Feed Main Page RSS
Conservatives Against Reagan RSS Feed Conservatives Against Reagan RSS
View Article  What Is Going on with Conservatives in the GOP? Part I

For quite some time I have been concerned about the nasty attacks that are being made by "Republicans" against Republicans who do not meet their ideological requirements, thereby violating one of Ronald Reagan’s most important commandments, “Thou shalt not speak ill of your fellow Republicans.”  This past week a series of posts over at GOP Progress  and conservative attacks on Liz Mair have only illustrated the problem.  Until recently, I’ve never known Republicans of any ilk (liberal, moderate, or conservative) to be attacked so viciously by others who claim to be Republican.  Until recently there was never a cult-like ideology where anyone who claimed to be a Republican must pass a litmus test.

 

You can’t run a political party or entice voters that way.  It reeks of the foul stench of a cult.  In a cult people are brainwashed, harassed, and sometimes tortured until they agree with the views of the self-proclaimed leader.  Unfortunately this is what appears to be happening with various and sundry ideologically RIGHT conservatives who have decided they are the true Republicans and anyone who disagrees with them needs to be excommunicated from the party.

 

This is a recipe for electoral disaster.  We saw it in November when we lost the House and the Senate.  If we are not careful and if all factions of the GOP do not grow up and behave like adults, we’re going to be losing elections for a very long time. 

 

The Republican Party is a “Big Tent Party” where many views are allowed and based on party principles, people are allowed freedom of thought, assembly, and speech.  To constantly harass and threaten those who do not 100% agree with an ideology is not what the Republican Party stands for at all. The very act of doing so makes one wonder if the party doing the harassing even knows what it is to be a Republican.

 

The Republican Party stands for freedom.  To disallow that very practice within the party is disaster, abject disaster.  It is time for those individuals and groups who feel we are not RIGHT enough for them to sit back, take a deep breath, and get a grip on life.  If you do not begin using your head to think things through in a logical intelligent manner, you are doing nothing but helping Howard Dean liberals.  Maybe that is what you want.  I don’t know.  I do know we have a serious problem and it isn’t coming from GOP members who are liberal, moderate, or Reagan Conservatives.  It is coming from people who have usurped the party and turned it into something Ronald Reagan would never allow.

 

“…And just to set the record straight, let me say this about our friends who are now Republicans but who do not identify themselves as conservatives: I want the record to show that I do not view the new revitalized Republican Party as one based on a principle of exclusion. After all, you do not get to be a majority party by searching for groups you won’t associate or work with. If we truly believe in our principles, we should sit down and talk. Talk with anyone, anywhere, at any time if it means talking about the principles for the Republican Party. Conservatism is not a narrow ideology, nor is it the exclusive property of conservative activists….”

Last Sunday I began the Pink Flamingo posting with this quote and ended with the following comment:  Okay, what idiot would be so brazen as to say something like that?  Would you believe Ronald W. Reagan on Feb. 6, 1977?

                                                                    

Unfortunately during the past few months a battle seems to be growing within the Republican Party. It is between the ranks of those who feel they are the heirs of the message of Reagan and the keeper of the flame and everyone else.  The perfect illustration of the problems we are now experiencing is a comment that was posted over on The Pink Flamingo the other day.  I am not revealing the name of the woman who posted it.

 

Lindsey Graham is a big moderate. He wants media adulation, like McCain, on fact his main goal seems to be to impress McCain: he says whatever Mcain (sic)  does. There are many instances of Graham RINO'ing it up: Gang of 14, the torture bill, this summer on military tribunals, etc. He's pretty spineless on most things- not a true conservative. Rush does the same thing to McCain, because you can't respect them as conservatives.”

Kristin’s comment proves my oft stated point that today’s RIGHT conservatives who claim to be Republican have no earthly idea just who or what Ronald Reagan was and what  he actually believed.  In the same Feb. 6, 1977 (The Shining City on the Hill speech) it is though Reagan knew his version of Conservativism would be perverted into some sort of a cult.

 

 “…One thing that must be made clear in post-Watergate is this: The American new conservative majority we represent is not based on abstract theorizing of the kind that turns off the American people, but on common sense, intelligence, reason, hard work, faith in God, and the guts to say: "Yes, there are things we do strongly believe in, that we are willing to live for, and yes, if necessary, to die for." That is not "ideological purity." It is simply what built this country and kept it great.

 

Let us lay to rest, once and for all, the myth of a small group of ideological purists trying to capture a majority. Replace it with the reality of a majority trying to assert its rights against the tyranny of powerful academics, fashionable left-revolutionaries, some economic illiterates who happen to hold elective office and the social engineers who dominate the dialogue and set the format in political and social affairs. If there is any ideological fanaticism in American political life, it is to be found among the enemies of freedom on the left or right -- those who would sacrifice principle to theory, those who worship only the god of political, social and economic abstractions, ignoring the realities of everyday life. They are not conservatives. 

 

Our first job is to get this message across to those who share most of our principles. If we allow ourselves to be portrayed as ideological shock troops without correcting this error we are doing ourselves and our cause a disservice. Wherever and whenever we can, we should gently but firmly correct our political and media friends who have been perpetuating the myth of conservatism as a narrow ideology. Whatever the word may have meant in the past, today conservatism means principles evolving from experience and a belief in change when necessary, but not just for the sake of change…”

 

Now, do you understand the words of Ronald Reagan… If there is any ideological fanaticism in American political life, it is to be found among the enemies of freedom on the left or right -- those who would sacrifice principle to theory, those who worship only the god of political, social and economic abstractions, ignoring the realities of everyday life. They are not conservatives…” 

Reagan understood that ideological conservatives from the far right were just as dangerous to the freedom of this nation as the ideological liberals from the far left.  They are on in the same.  The only difference in their cult-like adherence to an ideology is the fact that one is left and the other is right.

I'm a Republican Because...

I BELIEVE the strength of our nation lies with the individual and that each person’s dignity, freedom, ability and responsibility must be honored.

I BELIEVE in equal rights, equal justice and equal opportunity for all, regardless of race, creed, sex, age or disability.

 

I BELIEVE free enterprise and encouraging individual initiative have brought this nation opportunity, economic growth and prosperity.

 

I BELIEVE government must practice fiscal responsibility and allow individuals to keep more of the money they earn.

 

I BELIEVE the proper role of government is to provide for the people only those critical functions that cannot be performed by individuals or private organizations, and that the best government is that which governs least.

 

I BELIEVE the most effective, responsible and responsive government is government closest to the people.

 

I BELIEVE Americans must retain the principles that have made us strong while developing new and innovative ideas to meet the challenges of changing times.

 

I BELIEVE Americans value and should preserve our national strength and pride while working to extend peace, freedom and human rights throughout the world.

 

FINALLY, I believe the Republican Party is the best vehicle for translating these ideals into positive and successful principles of government.

 

I think one of the problems we are facing within the Republican Party is the fact that people have lost sight of just what/who is a “real” Republican. Maybe we need a primer on just who Republicans are and what we stand for. 

 

Let’s start with the History of the GOP. 

View Article  What Is Going on with Conservatives in the GOP? Part II

Currently 

The Republican Party is comprised of many informal factions, which often overlap but do not necessarily agree. For example, there are Fiscal Conservatives, Evangelicals, Social Conservatives, Neoconservatives, Paleoconservatives, Libertarians, Moderates (sometimes derided as Republican In Name Only, or RINOs, by more conservative Republicans), and Log Cabin Republicans.The Republican Party is the more socially conservative and economically libertarian of the two major parties, and has closer ties to both Wall Street (large corporations) and Main Street (locally owned businesses) but has little support among labor unions. The party supports lower taxes, limited government on economic issues, and favors business; it supports government intervention in some social issues such as abortion.[1] In his 1981 inaugural address, Republican President Ronald Reagan summed up his belief in limited government when he said, "In the present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem."[2] Since 1980, the GOP has contained what George Will calls "unresolved tensions between, two flavors of conservatism -- Western and Southern." The Western brand, says Will, "is largely libertarian, holding that pruning big government will allow civil society -- and virtues nourished by it and by the responsibilities of freedom -- to flourish." The Southern variety, however, reflects a religiosity based in evangelical and fundamentalist churches that is less concerned with economics and more with moralistic issues, such as opposition to abortion and homosexuality.[3] There is of course a strong Christian evangelical Republican movement in the Western United States; and in no way should these two movements—economic libertarianism and social conservatism—be considered mutually exclusive, since, especially within the Republican Party, they often overlap.”

Today, many of the most vocal supporters of the RIGHT wing of the GOP have associations or are talking talking points from the CofCC.   I am truly concerned that today’s RIGHT conservatives have been hoodwinked and led astray by organizations such as the Council of Conservative Citizens (CofCC) and endorsing their ‘principles’.  The CofCC (as this ADL link shows)   evolved out of the old White Citizen’s Council  There have been accusations of racism for years.  The SPLC has an excellent profile of Gordon Baum, the leader of the CofCC. 

Kirstin, mentioned above, is parroting the words of the SC chapter of the CofCC as they attempt to have Senator Lindsey Graham removed from office because he does not meet with their standards of ‘conservative purity.  Strangely enough, many of the RIGHT attacks of John McCain also parrot the language the CofCC uses.  Is the CofCC calling the shots and the truly RIGHT branch of the GOP is being sucked into their on special version of racism and hate?  I truly hope not, but there are signs this is indeed happening. 

“…The Council's state chapter president, Kyle Rogers, said the rally's purpose was to convince state congressmen to vote against guest-worker programs and amnesty. "We got to put pressure on the House Republicans," Rogers said. "President George W. Bush is pressuring them to accept amnesty. But the whole state of South Carolina will turn against you (senators). "The state is already furious at Lindsey Graham. His career is shot." Citizens speak out Protest participants lined the entranceway of the Channel 4 news station with flags and signs that read: "Lendsey (sic) Graham is a traitor," and "Stop the Invasion."Passing motorists honked their horns and shouted out "America!" as they drove past the rally. The location of the protest was ideal for Greenville city traffic visibility, and it also blocked the entrance to the news station. "WYFF said that we had dozens of people at the last protest," Rogers said. According to Rogers, there were at least a 1,000 people in attendance. So standing in front of the news station was "symbolic." "Most conservative events don't draw the numbers the left wing does because of the media," Rogers said. "But we're going to keep going despite of them." The small numbers didn't fetter the enthusiasm participants had for their cause…” 

 

This is also important for yet another reason.  Kyle Rogers was active in arranging the infamous appearance of Colorado’s Tom Tancredo at a CofCC and League of the South event in Columbia last summer.   Or as the Denver Post peged it, Tancredo Sings with Bigots

 

Baum's associates include former Georgia Congressman Bob Barr.

"A personal injury lawyer specializing in auto accidents and workmen's compensation claims in St. Louis, Baum formed the organization in 1985 based on the mailing lists of the segregationistWhite Citizens Councils for whom he had been the Midwest field organizer. It grew to include some 15,000 members, mostly in the deep South, and to have genuine political power — power that could be glimpsed when the group's links to Lott and then-U.S. Rep. Bob Barr (R-Ga.) were exposed...." 

There is a spider's web of dots to connect including the fact that the CofCC meets with Stormfront when they have national conferences.

 

Or try this piece about Stormfront and the CofCC.  I hope you are getting this.  Jeffrey Feldman has discovered the following:

"...Members of the IKA including an Imperial Officer attended the June 16-17 Council of Conservative Citizens conference in Louisville, Kentucky. There were many exemplary speakers at this event (Don Black, Paul Fromm, Sam Dickson, Col. Robt. Slimp, Dr. Ed Fields, James Edwards, Dr. Brent Nelson, Kevin Lamb, and others) and there was music to enjoy as well. Don't let the word "Conservative" or the formal attire give you the wrong idea – these gentlemen aren't your typical conservative buffoons. The speeches given were absolutely revolutionary and quite informative. The IKA made many important contacts networking at the conference which will prove beneficial to future endeavors. The conference was a fine experience and we would like to extend our thanks to the organizers and attendees of this event for their warm welcoming and hospitality.

WHITE UNITY!

–Imperial Godi, Imperial Klans of America..."

Have you ever smelled a rat?  Try misogonist Carey Rogers and his anti-feminist life’s work.  Evidently he doesn’t like women, unless they are silent, barefoot, and pregnant.  He especially doesn’t approve of them in conservative politics, and feels the presence of women such as myself have corrupted the Republican Party.  More power to him!   (Oh, FYI, he also believes more women commit violence against men that men commit violence against women.  Bet he also doesn’t believe men rape women, either.   Guess the little ladys  just askin’ for it.)  I just love the way RIGHT conservatives twist and misuse facts then say only liberals do it. 

 

“…Thankfully, some in the conservative ranks have bravely spoken out against the rad-fem jihad, including Phyllis Schlafly, Ann Coulter, Laura Schlessinger, Catherine Seipp, Kathryn Jean Lopez, and Myrna Blyth. But why are there only six, not 600 conservative women on the list? And what about conservative men? Are the conservative no-shows intimidated or merely complacent? Why haven’t the mainstream conservative organizations come out four-square against radical feminism?  To be sure, one reason is that the conservative movement has become beholden to the electoral imperatives of the Republican party, fearing that any criticism of feminism might stir a backlash on election day. This fear is misplaced, however, as only a quarter of American women call themselves feminist, and 22% of women say that being called a feminist would be an “insult.” Another reason is that many conservative men – especially politicians and newspaper editors—confuse ladies-first chivalry with becoming water-carriers for the latest feminist myth-de-jour. It’s time that these guys wise-up to the feminist bait-and-switch. These gals claim to be the complete equals to men. But voice any doubts about their ideology, and they lapse into a pathetic cocoon of hurt feelings. And then there are those ladies who claim to be straight-laced conservatives, but bristle with an anti-male hostility or spread poisonous gender myths….”

 

Why do I digress?  It is quite simple.  For months I’ve been trying to unearth the roots of this very nasty strain of RIGHT minded conservatives who think they own the Republican Party.  I keep finding some interesting little tidbits here and there.   You need to connect the dots.

 

Carey Roberts writes his wonderfully enlightened material for a number of good conservative RIGHT publications.  One of them is Aeonweb that is run by Move Off.com.MoveOff. Com is a part of the New Media Alliance. The New Media Alliance is owned by Heritage Media Partnerships. Heritage Media Partnerships is part of Reality Check. org.   There are a number of umbrella organizations all spewing the same bait and switch.  Gary Schneider   is the front name for the IRS reports. The New Media Alliance works in conjunction with Townhall.

 

Part of the New Media Alliance web includes the American Daily. One of the top contributors to the American Daily is Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D. Peterson has, in my humble opinion, penned some of the most bigoted, hate filled, misrepresentations about the Hispanic people I've ever seen.  Then there is Timely Topics. Another publication is the UsaSentinel. I have no idea what RTPX is. North America Views is another part of the spider web.  Then there is Moveoff Us.  You should note that this site links to the Constitution Party.  I keep saying we're not dealing with actual Republicans here, but people who are conservative who pretend to be Republican.  Then there is the Conservative Press. MoveOffWs is also part of the problem.  Then there is News by UsTruth in Conviction   The View from 1776Conservative Crusader

 

Now we come to Republican Voices  by Emil Levitin, who is a member of GOP Bloggers.  And there is the New Media Journal that claims to be Republican. The PubliusForum is part of the group. And then we have Frosty Woodbridge, who defies description.  I would love to call him the Cindy Sheehan of the whacked out right. There is Time to Vote.  And they have the Capital Hill Coffeehouse. The most fun is the only Republican political figure you see any of these organizations linking to is TancredoGreat Minds Think Right  How about Mad as Hell.

 

The Roberts article that started all of this is from News With Views that is ultra conservative and terribly unGOP.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

View Article  Ronald Reagan and Immigration - It's Not What You Think!

From the Opinion Journal Reagan on Immigration
GOP nativists lose one for the Gipper.
Sunday, May 21, 2006 12:01 a.m. EDT

One myth currently popular on the political right is that the immigration debate pits populist conservatives in the Ronald Reagan mold against Big Business "elites" who've hijacked the Republican Party. It's closer to the truth to say that what's really being hijacked here is the Gipper's reputation.

One of the Reagan Presidency's symbolic highlights was the July 3, 1986, celebration of a refurbished Statue of Liberty and Ellis Island, the gateway for immigrants a century ago. ...To Reagan, the conservative optimist, immigration was a vital part of his vision of this country as "a shining city upon a Hill," in the John Winthrop phrase he quoted so often. ... This view was apparent in Reagan's public statements well before he became President. In one of his radio addresses, in November 1977, he wondered about what he called "the illegal alien fuss. Are great numbers of our unemployed really victims of the illegal alien invasion, or are those illegal tourists actually doing work our own people won't do? One thing is certain in this hungry world: No regulation or law should be allowed if it results in crops rotting in the fields for lack of harvesters." As a Californian, Reagan understood the role of immigrant labor in agriculture.

..."I believe we must resolve the problem at our southern border with full regard to the problems and needs of Mexico. I have suggested legalizing the entry of Mexican labor into this country on much the same basis you proposed, although I have not put it into the sense of restoring the bracero program." The bracero program was a guest-worker program similar to the one now being proposed by President Bush. It was killed in the mid-1960s, largely due to opposition from unions.

During the same campaign, circa December 1979, the Gipper responded to criticism from conservative columnist Holmes Alexander with the following: "Please believe me when I tell you the idea of a North American accord has been mine for many, many years. I have seen presidents, both Democrat and Republican, approach our neighbors with pre-concocted plans in which their only input is to vote 'yes.'

"Some months before I declared, I asked for a meeting and crossed the border to meet with the president of Mexico. I did not go with a plan. I went, as I said in my announcement address, to ask him his ideas--how we could make the border something other than a locale for a nine-foot fence." So much for those conservatives who think the Gipper would have endorsed a 2,000-mile Tom Tancredo-Pat Buchanan wall.

It's true that in November 1986 Reagan signed the Immigration Reform and Control Act, which included more money for border police and employer sanctions. The Gipper was a practical politician who bowed that year to one of the periodic anti-immigration uprisings from the GOP's nativist wing. But even as he signed that bill, he also insisted on a provision for legalizing immigrants already in the U.S.--that is, he supported "amnesty."

In his signing statement, Reagan declared: "We have consistently supported a legalization program which is both generous to the alien and fair to the countless thousands of people throughout the world who seek legally to come to America. The legalization provisions in this act will go far to improve the lives of a class of individuals who now must hide in the shadows, without access to many of the benefits of a free and open society. Very soon many of these men and women will be able to step into the sunlight and, ultimately, if they choose, they may become Americans."

 Yes, times change, and it's impossible to know what precisely the Gipper would do at the current moment. But judging from these quotes and so many others across his long career, we feel confident in asserting that Mr. Bush and those who support more open immigration are far closer to Reagan's views than today's restrictionists are.

The current immigration political panic is not unlike many in America's past, including a couple while Reagan was in public life. He always avoided the temptation to join them, no doubt realizing that they were short-sighted politically, and, more important, inconsistent with his vision of America as the last best hope of mankind.

Remarks at the Opening Ceremonies of the Statue of Liberty Centennial Celebration in New York, New York

July 3, 1986

Thank you. And Lee Iacocca, thank you on behalf of all of America. President and Madame Mitterrand, my fellow Americans: The iron workers from New York and New Jersey who came here to begin restoration work were at first puzzled and a bit put off to see foreign workers, craftsmen from France, arrive. Jean Wiart, the leader of the French workers, said his countrymen understood. After all, he asked, how would Frenchmen feel if Americans showed up to help restore the Eiffel Tower? But as they came to know each other -- these Frenchmen and Americans -- affections grew; and so, too, did perspectives.

The Americans were reminded that Miss Liberty, like the many millions she's welcomed to these shores, is of foreign birth, the gift of workers, farmers, and shopkeepers and children who donated hundreds of thousands of francs to send her here. They were the ordinary people of France. This statue came from their pockets and from their hearts. The French workers, too, made discoveries. Monsieur Wiart, for example, normally lives in a 150-year-old cottage in a small French town, but for the last year he's been riding the subway through Brooklyn. ``A study in contrasts,'' he said -- contrasts indeed. But he has also told the newspapers that he and his countrymen learned something else at Liberty Island. For the first time, they worked in proximity with Americans of Jewish, black, Italian, Irish, Russian, Polish, and Indian backgrounds. ``Fascinating,'' he said, ``to see different ethnic and national types work and live so well together.'' Well, it's how we like to think of America. And it's good to know that Miss Liberty is still giving life to the dream of a new world where old antagonisms could be cast aside and people of every nation could live together as one.

It's especially fitting that this lesson should be relived and relearned here by Americans and Frenchmen. President Mitterrand, the French and American people have forged a special friendship over the course of two centuries. Yes, in the 1700's, France was the midwife of our liberty. In two World Wars, America stood with France as she fought for her life and for civilization. And today, Mr. President, with infinite gentleness, your countrymen tend the final resting places, marked now by rows of white crosses and stars, of more than 60,000 Americans who remain on French soil, a reminder since the days of Lafayette of our mutual struggles and sacrifices for freedom. So, tonight, as we celebrate the friendship of our two nations, we also pray: May it ever be so. God bless America, and vive la France!

And yet, my fellow Americans, it is not only the friendship of two peoples but the friendship of all peoples that brings us here tonight. We celebrate something more than the restoration of this statue's physical grandeur. Another worker here, Scott Aronsen, a marble restorer, has put it well: ``I grew up in Brooklyn and never went to the Statue of Liberty. But when I first walked in there to work, I thought about my grandfathers coming through here.'' And which of us does not think of other grandfathers and grandmothers, from so many places around the globe, for whom this statue was the first glimpse of America?

``She was silhouetted very clear,'' one of them wrote about standing on deck as their ship entered New York Harbor. ``We passed her very slowly. Of course we had to look up. She was beautiful.'' Another talked of how all the passengers rushed to one side of the boat for a fast look at their new home and at her. ``Everybody was crying. The whole boat bent toward her. She was beautiful with the early morning light.'' To millions returning home, especially from foreign wars, she was also special. A young World War I captain of artillery described how, on a troopship returning from France, even the most hard-bitten veteran had trouble blinking back the tears. ``I've never seen anything that looked so good,'' that doughboy, Harry Truman, wrote to his fiance, Bess, back in Independence, Missouri, ``as the Liberty Lady in New York Harbor.''

And that is why tonight we celebrate this mother of exiles who lifts her light beside the golden door. Many of us have seen the picture of another worker here, a tool belt around his waist, balanced on a narrow metal rod of scaffolding, leaning over to place a kiss on the forehead of Miss Liberty. Tony Soraci, the grandson of immigrant Italians, said it was something he was proud to do, ``something to tell my grandchildren.'' Robert Kearney feels the same way. At work on the statue after a serious illness, he gave $10,000 worth of commemorative pins to those who visited here. Part of the reason, he says, was an earlier construction job over in Hoboken and his friend named Blackie. They could see the harbor from the building they were working on, and every morning Blackie would look over the water, give a salute, and say, ``That's my gal!''

Well, the truth is, she's everybody's gal. We sometimes forget that even those who came here first to settle the new land were also strangers. I've spoken before of the tiny Arabella, a ship at anchor just off the Massachusetts coast. A little group of Puritans huddled on the deck. And then John Winthrop, who would later become the first Governor of Massachusetts, reminded his fellow Puritans there on that tiny deck that they must keep faith with their God, that the eyes of all the world were upon them, and that they must not forsake the mission that God had sent them on, and they must be a light unto the nations of all the world -- a shining city upon a hill.

Call it mysticism if you will, I have always believed there was some divine providence that placed this great land here between the two great oceans, to be found by a special kind of people from every corner of the world, who had a special love for freedom and a special courage that enabled them to leave their own land, leave their friends and their countrymen, and come to this new and strange land to build a New World of peace and freedom and hope. Lincoln spoke about hope as he left the hometown he would never see again to take up the duties of the Presidency and bring America through a terrible Civil War. At each stop on his long train ride to Washington, the news grew worse: The Nation was dividing; his own life was in peril. On he pushed, undaunted. In Philadelphia he spoke in Independence Hall, where 85 years earlier the Declaration of Independence had been signed. He noted that much more had been achieved there than just independence from Great Britain. It was, he said, ``hope to the world, future for all time.''

Well, that is the common thread that binds us to those Quakers [Puritans] on the tiny deck of the Arabella, to the beleaguered farmers and landowners signing the Declaration in Philadelphia in that hot Philadelphia hall, to Lincoln on a train ready to guide his people through the conflagration, to all the millions crowded in the steerage who passed this lady and wept at the sight of her, and those who've worked here in the scaffolding with their hands and with their love -- Jean Wiart, Scott Aronsen, Tony Soraci, Robert Kearney, and so many others.

We're bound together because, like them, we too dare to hope -- hope that our children will always find here the land of liberty in a land that is free. We dare to hope too that we'll understand our work can never be truly done until every man, woman, and child shares in our gift, in our hope, and stands with us in the light of liberty -- the light that, tonight, will shortly cast its glow upon her, as it has upon us for two centuries, keeping faith with a dream of long ago and guiding millions still to a future of peace and freedom.

And now we will unveil that gallant lady. Thank you, and God bless you all.

Note: The President spoke at 9:28 p.m. on Governors Island. Following his remarks, the Statue of Liberty was illuminated. He then presented Medals of Liberty to Henry A. Kissinger, Franklin R. Chang-Diaz, I.M. Pei, Itzhak Perlman, James B. Reston, Kenneth Clark, Albert B. Sabin, An Wang, Elie Wiesel, Bob Hope, and Hanna Holburn Gray. Lee Iacocca was chairman of the Statue of Liberty and Ellis Island Foundation, which raised the funds for the restoration of the statue.