This Month
December 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Powered by BlogHarbor
Powered by BlogHarbor
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
Powered by BlogHarbor
Powered by BlogHarbor
Search
RSS Newsfeeds
The Subway Canaries Main RSS Feed Main Page RSS
Conservative Leadership RSS Feed Conservative Leadership RSS
View Article  What Is Going on with Conservatives in the GOP? Part I

For quite some time I have been concerned about the nasty attacks that are being made by "Republicans" against Republicans who do not meet their ideological requirements, thereby violating one of Ronald Reagan’s most important commandments, “Thou shalt not speak ill of your fellow Republicans.”  This past week a series of posts over at GOP Progress  and conservative attacks on Liz Mair have only illustrated the problem.  Until recently, I’ve never known Republicans of any ilk (liberal, moderate, or conservative) to be attacked so viciously by others who claim to be Republican.  Until recently there was never a cult-like ideology where anyone who claimed to be a Republican must pass a litmus test.

 

You can’t run a political party or entice voters that way.  It reeks of the foul stench of a cult.  In a cult people are brainwashed, harassed, and sometimes tortured until they agree with the views of the self-proclaimed leader.  Unfortunately this is what appears to be happening with various and sundry ideologically RIGHT conservatives who have decided they are the true Republicans and anyone who disagrees with them needs to be excommunicated from the party.

 

This is a recipe for electoral disaster.  We saw it in November when we lost the House and the Senate.  If we are not careful and if all factions of the GOP do not grow up and behave like adults, we’re going to be losing elections for a very long time. 

 

The Republican Party is a “Big Tent Party” where many views are allowed and based on party principles, people are allowed freedom of thought, assembly, and speech.  To constantly harass and threaten those who do not 100% agree with an ideology is not what the Republican Party stands for at all. The very act of doing so makes one wonder if the party doing the harassing even knows what it is to be a Republican.

 

The Republican Party stands for freedom.  To disallow that very practice within the party is disaster, abject disaster.  It is time for those individuals and groups who feel we are not RIGHT enough for them to sit back, take a deep breath, and get a grip on life.  If you do not begin using your head to think things through in a logical intelligent manner, you are doing nothing but helping Howard Dean liberals.  Maybe that is what you want.  I don’t know.  I do know we have a serious problem and it isn’t coming from GOP members who are liberal, moderate, or Reagan Conservatives.  It is coming from people who have usurped the party and turned it into something Ronald Reagan would never allow.

 

“…And just to set the record straight, let me say this about our friends who are now Republicans but who do not identify themselves as conservatives: I want the record to show that I do not view the new revitalized Republican Party as one based on a principle of exclusion. After all, you do not get to be a majority party by searching for groups you won’t associate or work with. If we truly believe in our principles, we should sit down and talk. Talk with anyone, anywhere, at any time if it means talking about the principles for the Republican Party. Conservatism is not a narrow ideology, nor is it the exclusive property of conservative activists….”

Last Sunday I began the Pink Flamingo posting with this quote and ended with the following comment:  Okay, what idiot would be so brazen as to say something like that?  Would you believe Ronald W. Reagan on Feb. 6, 1977?

                                                                    

Unfortunately during the past few months a battle seems to be growing within the Republican Party. It is between the ranks of those who feel they are the heirs of the message of Reagan and the keeper of the flame and everyone else.  The perfect illustration of the problems we are now experiencing is a comment that was posted over on The Pink Flamingo the other day.  I am not revealing the name of the woman who posted it.

 

Lindsey Graham is a big moderate. He wants media adulation, like McCain, on fact his main goal seems to be to impress McCain: he says whatever Mcain (sic)  does. There are many instances of Graham RINO'ing it up: Gang of 14, the torture bill, this summer on military tribunals, etc. He's pretty spineless on most things- not a true conservative. Rush does the same thing to McCain, because you can't respect them as conservatives.”

Kristin’s comment proves my oft stated point that today’s RIGHT conservatives who claim to be Republican have no earthly idea just who or what Ronald Reagan was and what  he actually believed.  In the same Feb. 6, 1977 (The Shining City on the Hill speech) it is though Reagan knew his version of Conservativism would be perverted into some sort of a cult.

 

 “…One thing that must be made clear in post-Watergate is this: The American new conservative majority we represent is not based on abstract theorizing of the kind that turns off the American people, but on common sense, intelligence, reason, hard work, faith in God, and the guts to say: "Yes, there are things we do strongly believe in, that we are willing to live for, and yes, if necessary, to die for." That is not "ideological purity." It is simply what built this country and kept it great.

 

Let us lay to rest, once and for all, the myth of a small group of ideological purists trying to capture a majority. Replace it with the reality of a majority trying to assert its rights against the tyranny of powerful academics, fashionable left-revolutionaries, some economic illiterates who happen to hold elective office and the social engineers who dominate the dialogue and set the format in political and social affairs. If there is any ideological fanaticism in American political life, it is to be found among the enemies of freedom on the left or right -- those who would sacrifice principle to theory, those who worship only the god of political, social and economic abstractions, ignoring the realities of everyday life. They are not conservatives. 

 

Our first job is to get this message across to those who share most of our principles. If we allow ourselves to be portrayed as ideological shock troops without correcting this error we are doing ourselves and our cause a disservice. Wherever and whenever we can, we should gently but firmly correct our political and media friends who have been perpetuating the myth of conservatism as a narrow ideology. Whatever the word may have meant in the past, today conservatism means principles evolving from experience and a belief in change when necessary, but not just for the sake of change…”

 

Now, do you understand the words of Ronald Reagan… If there is any ideological fanaticism in American political life, it is to be found among the enemies of freedom on the left or right -- those who would sacrifice principle to theory, those who worship only the god of political, social and economic abstractions, ignoring the realities of everyday life. They are not conservatives…” 

Reagan understood that ideological conservatives from the far right were just as dangerous to the freedom of this nation as the ideological liberals from the far left.  They are on in the same.  The only difference in their cult-like adherence to an ideology is the fact that one is left and the other is right.

I'm a Republican Because...

I BELIEVE the strength of our nation lies with the individual and that each person’s dignity, freedom, ability and responsibility must be honored.

I BELIEVE in equal rights, equal justice and equal opportunity for all, regardless of race, creed, sex, age or disability.

 

I BELIEVE free enterprise and encouraging individual initiative have brought this nation opportunity, economic growth and prosperity.

 

I BELIEVE government must practice fiscal responsibility and allow individuals to keep more of the money they earn.

 

I BELIEVE the proper role of government is to provide for the people only those critical functions that cannot be performed by individuals or private organizations, and that the best government is that which governs least.

 

I BELIEVE the most effective, responsible and responsive government is government closest to the people.

 

I BELIEVE Americans must retain the principles that have made us strong while developing new and innovative ideas to meet the challenges of changing times.

 

I BELIEVE Americans value and should preserve our national strength and pride while working to extend peace, freedom and human rights throughout the world.

 

FINALLY, I believe the Republican Party is the best vehicle for translating these ideals into positive and successful principles of government.

 

I think one of the problems we are facing within the Republican Party is the fact that people have lost sight of just what/who is a “real” Republican. Maybe we need a primer on just who Republicans are and what we stand for. 

 

Let’s start with the History of the GOP. 

View Article  What Is Going on with Conservatives in the GOP? Part II

Currently 

The Republican Party is comprised of many informal factions, which often overlap but do not necessarily agree. For example, there are Fiscal Conservatives, Evangelicals, Social Conservatives, Neoconservatives, Paleoconservatives, Libertarians, Moderates (sometimes derided as Republican In Name Only, or RINOs, by more conservative Republicans), and Log Cabin Republicans.The Republican Party is the more socially conservative and economically libertarian of the two major parties, and has closer ties to both Wall Street (large corporations) and Main Street (locally owned businesses) but has little support among labor unions. The party supports lower taxes, limited government on economic issues, and favors business; it supports government intervention in some social issues such as abortion.[1] In his 1981 inaugural address, Republican President Ronald Reagan summed up his belief in limited government when he said, "In the present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem."[2] Since 1980, the GOP has contained what George Will calls "unresolved tensions between, two flavors of conservatism -- Western and Southern." The Western brand, says Will, "is largely libertarian, holding that pruning big government will allow civil society -- and virtues nourished by it and by the responsibilities of freedom -- to flourish." The Southern variety, however, reflects a religiosity based in evangelical and fundamentalist churches that is less concerned with economics and more with moralistic issues, such as opposition to abortion and homosexuality.[3] There is of course a strong Christian evangelical Republican movement in the Western United States; and in no way should these two movements—economic libertarianism and social conservatism—be considered mutually exclusive, since, especially within the Republican Party, they often overlap.”

Today, many of the most vocal supporters of the RIGHT wing of the GOP have associations or are talking talking points from the CofCC.   I am truly concerned that today’s RIGHT conservatives have been hoodwinked and led astray by organizations such as the Council of Conservative Citizens (CofCC) and endorsing their ‘principles’.  The CofCC (as this ADL link shows)   evolved out of the old White Citizen’s Council  There have been accusations of racism for years.  The SPLC has an excellent profile of Gordon Baum, the leader of the CofCC. 

Kirstin, mentioned above, is parroting the words of the SC chapter of the CofCC as they attempt to have Senator Lindsey Graham removed from office because he does not meet with their standards of ‘conservative purity.  Strangely enough, many of the RIGHT attacks of John McCain also parrot the language the CofCC uses.  Is the CofCC calling the shots and the truly RIGHT branch of the GOP is being sucked into their on special version of racism and hate?  I truly hope not, but there are signs this is indeed happening. 

“…The Council's state chapter president, Kyle Rogers, said the rally's purpose was to convince state congressmen to vote against guest-worker programs and amnesty. "We got to put pressure on the House Republicans," Rogers said. "President George W. Bush is pressuring them to accept amnesty. But the whole state of South Carolina will turn against you (senators). "The state is already furious at Lindsey Graham. His career is shot." Citizens speak out Protest participants lined the entranceway of the Channel 4 news station with flags and signs that read: "Lendsey (sic) Graham is a traitor," and "Stop the Invasion."Passing motorists honked their horns and shouted out "America!" as they drove past the rally. The location of the protest was ideal for Greenville city traffic visibility, and it also blocked the entrance to the news station. "WYFF said that we had dozens of people at the last protest," Rogers said. According to Rogers, there were at least a 1,000 people in attendance. So standing in front of the news station was "symbolic." "Most conservative events don't draw the numbers the left wing does because of the media," Rogers said. "But we're going to keep going despite of them." The small numbers didn't fetter the enthusiasm participants had for their cause…” 

 

This is also important for yet another reason.  Kyle Rogers was active in arranging the infamous appearance of Colorado’s Tom Tancredo at a CofCC and League of the South event in Columbia last summer.   Or as the Denver Post peged it, Tancredo Sings with Bigots

 

Baum's associates include former Georgia Congressman Bob Barr.

"A personal injury lawyer specializing in auto accidents and workmen's compensation claims in St. Louis, Baum formed the organization in 1985 based on the mailing lists of the segregationistWhite Citizens Councils for whom he had been the Midwest field organizer. It grew to include some 15,000 members, mostly in the deep South, and to have genuine political power — power that could be glimpsed when the group's links to Lott and then-U.S. Rep. Bob Barr (R-Ga.) were exposed...." 

There is a spider's web of dots to connect including the fact that the CofCC meets with Stormfront when they have national conferences.

 

Or try this piece about Stormfront and the CofCC.  I hope you are getting this.  Jeffrey Feldman has discovered the following:

"...Members of the IKA including an Imperial Officer attended the June 16-17 Council of Conservative Citizens conference in Louisville, Kentucky. There were many exemplary speakers at this event (Don Black, Paul Fromm, Sam Dickson, Col. Robt. Slimp, Dr. Ed Fields, James Edwards, Dr. Brent Nelson, Kevin Lamb, and others) and there was music to enjoy as well. Don't let the word "Conservative" or the formal attire give you the wrong idea – these gentlemen aren't your typical conservative buffoons. The speeches given were absolutely revolutionary and quite informative. The IKA made many important contacts networking at the conference which will prove beneficial to future endeavors. The conference was a fine experience and we would like to extend our thanks to the organizers and attendees of this event for their warm welcoming and hospitality.

WHITE UNITY!

–Imperial Godi, Imperial Klans of America..."

Have you ever smelled a rat?  Try misogonist Carey Rogers and his anti-feminist life’s work.  Evidently he doesn’t like women, unless they are silent, barefoot, and pregnant.  He especially doesn’t approve of them in conservative politics, and feels the presence of women such as myself have corrupted the Republican Party.  More power to him!   (Oh, FYI, he also believes more women commit violence against men that men commit violence against women.  Bet he also doesn’t believe men rape women, either.   Guess the little ladys  just askin’ for it.)  I just love the way RIGHT conservatives twist and misuse facts then say only liberals do it. 

 

“…Thankfully, some in the conservative ranks have bravely spoken out against the rad-fem jihad, including Phyllis Schlafly, Ann Coulter, Laura Schlessinger, Catherine Seipp, Kathryn Jean Lopez, and Myrna Blyth. But why are there only six, not 600 conservative women on the list? And what about conservative men? Are the conservative no-shows intimidated or merely complacent? Why haven’t the mainstream conservative organizations come out four-square against radical feminism?  To be sure, one reason is that the conservative movement has become beholden to the electoral imperatives of the Republican party, fearing that any criticism of feminism might stir a backlash on election day. This fear is misplaced, however, as only a quarter of American women call themselves feminist, and 22% of women say that being called a feminist would be an “insult.” Another reason is that many conservative men – especially politicians and newspaper editors—confuse ladies-first chivalry with becoming water-carriers for the latest feminist myth-de-jour. It’s time that these guys wise-up to the feminist bait-and-switch. These gals claim to be the complete equals to men. But voice any doubts about their ideology, and they lapse into a pathetic cocoon of hurt feelings. And then there are those ladies who claim to be straight-laced conservatives, but bristle with an anti-male hostility or spread poisonous gender myths….”

 

Why do I digress?  It is quite simple.  For months I’ve been trying to unearth the roots of this very nasty strain of RIGHT minded conservatives who think they own the Republican Party.  I keep finding some interesting little tidbits here and there.   You need to connect the dots.

 

Carey Roberts writes his wonderfully enlightened material for a number of good conservative RIGHT publications.  One of them is Aeonweb that is run by Move Off.com.MoveOff. Com is a part of the New Media Alliance. The New Media Alliance is owned by Heritage Media Partnerships. Heritage Media Partnerships is part of Reality Check. org.   There are a number of umbrella organizations all spewing the same bait and switch.  Gary Schneider   is the front name for the IRS reports. The New Media Alliance works in conjunction with Townhall.

 

Part of the New Media Alliance web includes the American Daily. One of the top contributors to the American Daily is Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D. Peterson has, in my humble opinion, penned some of the most bigoted, hate filled, misrepresentations about the Hispanic people I've ever seen.  Then there is Timely Topics. Another publication is the UsaSentinel. I have no idea what RTPX is. North America Views is another part of the spider web.  Then there is Moveoff Us.  You should note that this site links to the Constitution Party.  I keep saying we're not dealing with actual Republicans here, but people who are conservative who pretend to be Republican.  Then there is the Conservative Press. MoveOffWs is also part of the problem.  Then there is News by UsTruth in Conviction   The View from 1776Conservative Crusader

 

Now we come to Republican Voices  by Emil Levitin, who is a member of GOP Bloggers.  And there is the New Media Journal that claims to be Republican. The PubliusForum is part of the group. And then we have Frosty Woodbridge, who defies description.  I would love to call him the Cindy Sheehan of the whacked out right. There is Time to Vote.  And they have the Capital Hill Coffeehouse. The most fun is the only Republican political figure you see any of these organizations linking to is TancredoGreat Minds Think Right  How about Mad as Hell.

 

The Roberts article that started all of this is from News With Views that is ultra conservative and terribly unGOP.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

View Article  A PONDERING AMERICAN EXPOSE: Why Is Lou Dobbs So Biased on Immigration?

Thursday, August 10, 2006

The Reason Why Lou Dobbs is So Biased on Immigration?

I never paid too much attention to Lou Dobbs. I thought he sort of did the Wall Street show on CNN. It was only during the Dubai Port deal and his hysterical reporting on it that I started to pay attention to him. I was wondering as to the immigration debate why he was devoting huge parts and on some days the majority of it to immigration and illegal immigration. I also wondered why he was always a crictic of Bush and a cheerleader for all the Minutemen and Tancredo Crowd. The reason I became annoyed with this so called "reporting" was it was clear that it was so overwhemling biased. When I was researching Tancredo the other other day I came across something very interesting.
Tanton Population Control Group -Center For Immigration Studies(CIS) AWARDS Lou Dobbs the 2004 award for excellence in Reporting.
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
(Left to Right) Mark Krikorian-Head of CIS, Congessman Tancredo, Lou Dobbs of CNN at the June 10,2004 at the 2004 Eugene Katz Award Banquet in New YorkFull description of the event as well as introduction by Krikorian, the Intoduction of Dobbs by Tancredo and Dobbs's remarks here.

By the way Krikorian writes at National review giving us very unbiased conservative views of the immigration debate(Sarc).

Now journalist receive awards all the time and really it is no big deal. But remeber this anti immigration group(noticed I did't qualify that with the term illegal) and offspring of John Tanton who is a radical population control person is something we should look at. The whole remarks are interesting to read, but this part of Dobbs remarks are of great interest:

If we look at our population growth over the course of the past 40 years and do not understand that it has doubled and that based on current trends and that after childbirth and immigration and illegal immigration that this country could reach a population by the end of this century of one billion people. If you don’t understand that, we have further difficulties. Secondly, if we don’t understand that we are importing the population growth of other countries, whether it’s China or Mexico or any country in the world then we have a difficult time addressing the issue of illegal immigration . . . because all of these impacts are fundamental, all of these issues are fundamental, and they’re all interrelated. What kind of economy will we have? It depends upon growth. To hear both the head of the Chamber of Commerce and the head of the AFL-CIO support amnesty, because they believe it’s important to have that low-cost labor force, not only for organization or employment but to support the Baby Boomer generation, who will be retiring, so that they can pay into the Social Security system. This is the kind of reasoning that is going on in individual issues and too many of us are failing to look at the broad relationship amongst these issues. That’s what we’re trying to do on our broadcast, that we will remain committed to doing. In a time when we are in great contests for natural resources and for capital, globally, the impact of illegal immigration will be profound over the course of the next decade. For example in the western states, reservoirs—the principal water source, the Colorado River, is running at 50 percent of its historic levels. Yet population growth continues, and demand continues to climb—with no sight of any kind of abatement.

You see again this debate is not really about illegals. As I have pointed out time after time as well as others the people behind this debate for decades are radical population control people. FAIR,CIS, NUMBERS, ETC are all siblings of the radical John Tanton. They use all sorts of groups to further this radical agenda. That is the reason why there can be no "amnesty" or "guest worker program" because they want no newcomers practically at all. They want to reduce the population of this country to 150 million.If we look at our population growth over the course of the past 40 years and do not understand that it has doubled and that based on current trends and that after childbirth and immigration and illegal immigration that this country could reach a population by the end of this century of one billion people....Secondly, if we don’t understand that we are importing the population growth of other countries, whether it’s China or Mexico or any country in the world then we have a difficult time addressing the issue of illegal immigration . . . because all of these impacts are fundamental, all of these issues are fundamental, and they’re all interrelated.

Dobbs is a full believer in this propaganda. A fact that should be considered in evaluating his "reporting" of this issue and related issues. Today he was ranting against H1B visas? Why? Well I must tell you I dont think it is because of the terrorist threat really. I think it has to do with the above. You see he believes like the man who introduced him , Congressman Tancredo ,that
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
(Tancredo receiving Gift from Tenn Chapter of FAIR)

Now, of course this is nonsense. America is not full. In fact in great parts of the World there is a population decline crisis. We see it in Europe, we see it in Russia, We see it in Japan and yes we are seeing it in places like Mexico and even in China. As to resources in the USA, the problem is not population but the use. Water is wasted at great levels here. Much of the use of the Colorado river resources that Dobbs uses as a example is pure waste. For example look at how Israel has made a huge agricultural business out of what once was deserts. All through innovative ways of using scarce water. This waste can and should be reversed. Maybe we should start by not building a hundred new Golf Courses in Nevada that are big wastes of water. As to food supply we keep producing more than ever. We shall produce more food in the next 50 years through technology than has ever been produced.

There will be no one billion people here in the USA. That is all based on faux science and stats. However if people want to have this duscussion Mr Dobbs, lets be honest about it. Quit using this illegal alien issue to hide it.

Further this policy is fraught with risk. Already population replacement levels even in this Hemisphere are at dangerous level. While Population levels in Islamic Countries are exploding. One must ask if it is wise to reduce our population while countries where Radical Islam is expanding are reproducing like rabbits. Who will fund the armies and navys and man them if we reduce our population that far? Can we manage our standard of living if we reduce the population that low? It is dangerous policy in my view that needs to be discussed and not hidden
.

View Article  A PONDERING AMERICAN EXPOSE: Tancredo Loses It!

The PA from LA!

Tuesday, August 08, 2006

Immigration, Tancredo loses it, and how far we have fallen

I have a family emergency that calls me out of state tommorow. This shall be my last post but feel free to drop a email. I will be on the net tonight. My grandfather is having a operation and your prayers would be appreciated. This is a long post but I wish you would read it. I feel it is important. Also most of it is in the words of others, so you will not have to deal with clumsy engagement of the King's English. There are two post I am highlighting. One is current and shows how far we have fallen in political discourse among us conservatives. The Second is a trip down memory lane by a blogger that pegged the problem way back in May. I think both are revelant and perhaps are benefical to look at so we can save ourselves and make something good come out of this mess.

The first is a Called as Seen post on the immigration issue and ever present Congressman Tancredo. I am not just highlighting his post because he linked to me lol. I think his post is aptly titled. It sums up the whole way many of us "conservatives" have felt we have been treated by this self proclaimed "base". The Title of the Post is Shut up, Tom Tancredo explains. Basically Called as Seen is talking about Tancredo's Press release. Go to his blog and read it. It is quite a press release. I urge you to read the whole thing. Tancredo bascially tells Our President the we all voted on to stay in the White House and shut up. You see the President of the United States feelss he has something still to say. In fact he is coming to us to speak to us. Tancredo says "We’re trying to brand this as a fight between the Reid-Kennedy bill and the Republican bill. Nothing will do more to destroy our progress with voters than to have the Republican President follow us hearing-to-hearing arguing for the Reid-Kennedy approach.” Congreesman Tancredo from Colorado, this Louisiana boy respectfully says put a sock in it. If the President of United States that we voted on and the leader of the Free World wants to come to the towns where you are speaking to have his voice heard well more power to him. Called as Seen said exactly what I have been thinking but can't put into words:
"That said, it is not so much Tancredo's agenda that makes me see red. I have my disagreements with other people, like Internet Esquire (over Iraq). My partner on this blog and I first came across each other in a disagreement over reactivation of the Iowa-class battleships. But these disagreements have had a quality that has been in very short supply from the Tancredo-Malkin crowd: Respect.I'm sorry, but when your response to a person's disagreement with you is to tell them to shut up, it means you do not have much of an argument.

Why does Tancredo fear the Administration making its case for a comprehensive bill? Is it because recent events (and polling) have shown that the President's approach might be passed into law if it is explained?Tancredo has not only revealed that he lacks class or respect for those who disagree with him and wants to be able to freely demagouge a serious issue, he's also revealed that he doesn't have the guts to have a fair debate with the President of the United States. That says a lot more about Tancredo than it does President Bush."

Exactly. So well said if you ask me. Respect is the thing that has largely been missing from this debate. I have been voting Republican all my life for the most part. How people that dare question the extreme hardline approach in this debate have been treated is awful and unexcuseable. We have been told that we are part of some mythical open border lobby. We have been called trolls on internet forums, called spineless, and traitors. Well, I suppose if Bush can handle it as well as carrying on the weight of the World on his shoulders I can take a few barbs. There have been other Republicans that have been brave under these barbs. Governor Huckabee, Senator Grahmn , and Senator Brownback just to name a few. But what has happened has been unexuseable. Respect is the key. I and other conservatives I feel are still in a tad of shock that we are being called RINOS. Let me give you a tad of a warning. Many of us are taking names right now and we have long memories. That is not some threat. But why should you be trusted when you have turned on so many of your fellow conservatives like a pack of rabid dogs.The important factor is not where you are at on this immigration issue but how you have conducted yourself. That goes for officials, bloggers, media, and other people in the public square.

This has been noticed by other bloggers. I have never met
the Anchoress but I have been in politics long enough to realize that the way she views things is very much the way vast numbers of people view political things. The exception being that the Anchoress is tuned into the political scene more than most are. Her post on immigration here is the best I have seen and shows what I am struggling with and this nation has to struggle with. She was quite honest about this problem we have allowed to ferment for years. Just a part of her wonderful post:
John Paul II used to say that. In encouraging Solidarity, in evangelizing, he would say, “you have to deal with the world as it is, not as you would ideally like it to be.” He was right. And the world right now - as it is - is in flux, due to a systemic lack of interest in addressing this problem for decades. Point the finger at the government - every part of it. Point the finger at ourselves, too, for tuning this problem out for too long.

That also means we can't blame it all on the illegals either. We have used their talents and labor too for decades. You just can't break up families en mass without giving consideration to them or respecting their humanity. There is culpulbility on our part too. Sorry to say that. Americans hate blaming themselves. But justice demands it. It also needs to be considered when coming up with a solution and dealing out punishiment.

But I digress. It was amazing to see how this Catholic lady from up north was treated. Really it is not shocking in retrospect because we were getting the same treatment. And this was the good ole days. It is far worse now. I think her observations are important to look back on. On
May 12 2006 she posted in part of a great post:There is a terrible toxicity to our political and social exchanges - there is little real thought and lots of shrieking going on, lots of noise, little real discourse and precious little honesty. There is no way to debate because - no matter which side tries to get serious - a well-thought-out discourse is immediately shot down by the other side with a one-line-sneer, usually a specious one, that distorts or misdirects and never allows a thought to go forward. The disrespect between “sides” is staggering, and completely unproductive. But non-productivity seems to be what people like. It’s “safe.” If you don’t do anything, you can’t get blamed, right? More kicking things down the road. Let the guy who actually wants to take some action bear the brunt of your fear, your insecurity, your anger, your scorn, your impotence. If he doesn’t do it all perfectly, he’s a bum. That was May 12th!!!! The good ole days really. I wasn't being accuse of being a part of a plot back then. She also said in that post :The roiling hate that is the driving force behind the MSM and some parts of the blogosphere and so much more cannot produce anything good. All of these negatives cannot create a positive. I can’t be the only one who is feeling increasingly ill - not ill-at-ease, but physically ill.
Well thank God, The Anchoress didn't pack in talking about politics as she was announcing she was going to do. She like the rest of us took a deep breath and dared to state our views.
On May 15th the Anchoress when refering to a opinion piece on a "conservative" internet site that equated the ease of deportation of the Mexicans to Hitler's final solution said:Sadly, I’ve read similar sentiments on conservative forums all day. That’s where this unhinged, over-emotional rage-train is headed, folks. If this is representative of the current conservative fever-swamp, then I guess I will have to say pardon me, I guess I’m not a conservative, after all, and take one step leftward. Sadly it has gotten worse. If people don't want to be called racist then quit associating and giving approval to people that make such statements. Has anyone seen what Mexicans are described as lately. There is countless talk of how dirty they are and the diesases they carry. There are cartoons that describe them as parasites and leeches on the system. There is talk about how they are part of a plot to take over the Government and talk of their morality. Take a deep step back people. Look at your history that for all that is holy. That is freakin 1936 except it was a German man saying those things. It is has become unhinged.

View Article  Fake Leadership Syndrome - Part III - Real Leaders

Today in the Opinion Journal a group of thirty-three leaders posted their version or perhaps their answer to that absurd 'conservative' petition.  Look at this list of leaders and compare it to the list of other 'fake leaders'.  Then read their ideas.  I think they are a little too strict, but it is an improvement.

Jack Kemp (former congressman from New York);
George P. Shultz (distinguished fellow, Hoover Institution);
Jeanne Kirkpatrick (former ambassador to the U.N.);
Tamar Jacoby (senior fellow, Manhattan Institute);
Cesar V. Conda (senior fellow, FreedomWorks);
Ken Weinstein (CEO, Hudson Institute);
Grover Norquist (president, Americans for Tax Reform);
Jeff Bell (board of directors, American Conservative Union);
Larry Cirignano (president, Catholic Alliance);
Bill Kristol (editor, The Weekly Standard);
Arthur B. Laffer (chairman, Laffer Investments);
Linda Chavez (chairman, Center for Equal Opportunity);
Elaine Dezenski (former acting assistant secretary for policy development, Department of Homeland Security);
Lawrence Kudlow (economics editor, National Review Online);
John Podhoretz (columnist, the New York Post);
John McWhorter (senior fellow, Manhattan Institute);
Joseph Bottum (editor, First Things);
Max Boot (senior fellow, Council on Foreign Relations);
Vin Weber (former congressman from Minnesota);
Richard Gilder (partner, Gilder Gagnon Howe & Co., LLC);
Ed Goeas (Republican strategist);
Martin Anderson (senior fellow, Hoover Institution);
J.C. Watts (former congressman from Oklahoma);
Ed Gillespie (former chairman, Republican National Committee);
C. Stewart Verdery, Jr. (former assistant secretary for border and transportation security policy, Department of Homeland Security);
Diana Furchtgott-Roth (senior fellow, Hudson Institute);
Robert de Posada (president, the Latino Coalition);
Clint Bolick (winner of 2006 Bradley Prize);
Steven Wagner (former director, human trafficking program, Department of Health and Human Services);
Steve Forbes (CEO, Forbes Inc.);
Gary Rosen (managing editor, Commentary);
Michael Petrucelli (former acting director, U.S. citizenship and immigration services, Department of Homeland Security);
And John C. Weicher (senior fellow, Hudson Institute)